June 25, 2019 is approaching!

Nonlocal Universe

Did you buy your Rose for Michael? If not, please followOneRose 4MJJ

5650 Roses of Love & Innocence by Sunday May 19th 7:22pm EST

PayPal. onerose4mjj@gmail.com

$3.00 per long stem Rose Love & Innocence is our message this year with Freedom Red & White Dove Roses In honor of Michael on June 25th

Rose’s are donated to various charities in LA.

🌹🌹🌹Will you be in LA on June 25th? Perhaps you wish to join theMJInnocent/LOVE Rally(byMJJJP)

June 25th 2019 MJInnocent/LOVE Rally 

Since the Michael Jackson fanbase is so DIVERSE, MJJJusticeProject  thought it only fitting to have a large gathering while fans from all over the world are visiting Los Angeles in observance of the 10th Commemoration of Michael Jackson’s passing.  Michael Jackson has achieved his goal of immortality and we hope to gather in HONOR of his life and to peacefully demonstrate that we STAND…

View original post 253 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Believe White People: Michael Jackson, Leaving Neverland, the Media and Race”

by Brotha Wolf

First off, I want to say that I am NOT writing this from a liberal or conservative point-of-view, nor am I writing this as an ardent fan of Michael Jackson. I’m not a journalist or author. I’m just a concerned citizen.

I will also say that I have not nor will I plan to watch the “documentary” Leaving Neverland. (I’ll explain why I use that word in quotes later.) I know that this admission alone will render the rest of this essay irrelevant as watching the film is a requirement for critiquing it. This entire essay may not get to be published at all. However, I WON’T critique the film, but I WILL express my thoughts and feelings of the mainstream media and society’s overall positive reaction to it.

Michael Jackson’s legacy as arguably the greatest entertainer the world is well-earned and has remained strong, especially ever after his death. The pedophilic accusations that have dogged him for the latter half of his life seemed like a distant memory for years or at least an insignificant thought. Then, in 2019, the accusations resurfaced in a “documentary” that has caught the world’s – the West at least – attention. Leaving Neverland is a two-part, four hour-long film directed by British filmmaker Dan Reed. It features testimony by two of Jackson’s accusers, Wade Robson and James Safechuck. The general news media’s responses to the film included words like “harrowing” and “disturbing”. As such, they concluded that the film is the final nail in the coffin. Even Oprah Winfrey decided to air a special featuring Reed, Robson and Safechuck, and it seemed like the special further cemented Jackson as a disgusting pedophile apparently without question or objections.

In almost no time later, cancel or mute culture emerged in the form of removing Jackson’s songs from the playlists of a few radio stations around the world. Statues of him were removed from public places. One way or another, Michael Jackson was erased despite the same media’s sharp advisories against such moves.

Still, with ONE film with apparently nothing other than testimonies from two men, the mainly “liberal” media and those who turn to them for news and information have collectively indicted Michael Jackson as a smooth criminal and believed the testimonies of Robson and Safechuck instantaneously.

And I would’ve too if I didn’t stop and think about a few things.

Ordinarily, I would’ve jumped on and sided with the accusers, even though I never saw nor plan to see the film. But I asked myself, why would, or rather why SHOULD I believe a film that’s considered a “documentary”, especially if the media says so?” It seemed suspicious, especially when the director claimed that the film isn’t about Michael Jackson. Pardon me, but how could it not be when it’s about two men who claim to be victims of the late superstar? Also, why would I watch a film meant to shed light on a terrible crime when the director describes it as more of a “love story”? And due to me being a black man in America, why Michael Jackson, another black man, of all people? It was then I CHOSE to see the massive elephant in the room: race.

As a member of “the other” and given the history and treatment towards non-mainstream populations, I can’t help but suspect and observe how Jackson’s legacy is treated as opposed to other luminaries accused of similar or worse crimes who have a lighter skin hue than mine. Granted, in his later years, Jackson’s skin was brightened, but he was still a black man in America.

Of course, people will vehemently object that the Neverland backlash has any hint of racism, and to suggest otherwise is to – at worst – blame the “victims”. I will most likely be called a ‘stan’ or worse, a rape apologist. But I couldn’t help but feel that the media backlash had something to do with the fact that Jackson was black and his accusers and the director are all white. So, I wonder if the “believing the victim” plea in this case is more like the case of “believing white victims”, a plea that has led to the oppression and murder of black people for ages. A simple rape accusation from a white woman would lead to the death and destruction of African-Americans and even whole black communities whether it happened or not. And even though that’s not likely to happen from this case – this time, it’s white men – there’s an aura of terminating Jackson’s history and legacy by word alone that conjures immediate fears and the notion that white people claiming victimhood status and where the suspect is black are to be believed no questions asked.

Yes, Michael Jackson was wealthy during his time and as the liberal way of thinking suggests, he’s part of the corrupt power structure within the music industry by association. With these allegations levied against him – again – even after his death through a motion picture, he’s considered the “enemy”. We decide that he used his star power to lure little (white) boys to his home to engage in intercourse with them.

Jackson was a black man, and in this country, it doesn’t matter how much money or power you have, you’re still seen as “different” or “less-than” in the eyes of white society. In most cases, you’re guilty of…something. In Jackson’s case, it was pedophilia, and no proof to exonerate him will be admissible.

Believe the victims. Believe the white men. Believe the white-owned media who believe the white men.

The news media believed the words of Robson and Safechuck and praised Reed for his film. There were NO questions asked as to the validity of the two men’s stories, two men with questionable backgrounds. There was no search to how accurate their testimonies are. No evidence to strengthen their stories, according to those who’ve seen the film. No interviews with other people aside from the men and, according to writer Stereo Williams, “…Someone reacting to what they’ve been told by Robson and Safechuck.” Not even the director is scrutinized. He was mostly placed on a pedestal as a man supposedly exposing a dirty secret. Simultaneously, most opinion writers chastised Jackson’s fans, supporters and critics of Neverland as “stans, truthers, cultists, conspiracy theorists” and even “rape apologists” for thinking that their idol was innocent and that Robson and Safechuck are liars without any investigations or interviews. While some may be, it’s a broad and damaging statement to dish out to all who have questions and doubts about the film and the accusations it presented.

The verdict was clear.

Detractors often cite the Me Too and Time’s Up movements as the reasons why the news media seems largely supportive of the film. The narrative has been about giving victims of sex-based crimes a voice and more credibility. Though, I think it’s unfair to blame the movements for the media’s appreciative response to the film, I think it shows that journalism has fallen off their mission of fact-finding for the sake of agenda pushing. The current atmosphere has largely been anti-Jackson with conversations surrounding the age old mystery of separating the art from the artist, the possibility of rewriting Jackson’s history and the side-effects of hero worship. All the while, the news continues to bury Jackson without much contemplation about the validity of the accusers and the director and how race was possibly a key component in not only the film’s creation but how the media saw it.

The news media grasped reactionary politics as the film’s emotional intensity seems to conclude that it’s true and that it’s a final nail in the coffin for his legacy.

It also seems that the media seems more invested and harsher when crime suspects are black, and black celebrities seem more insatiable to them. Extensive coverage of O.J. Simpson’s ordeal, Bill Cosby’s rape accusations and R. Kelly’s abuse to women seems to garner more attention than Harvey Weinstein, Louis C. K, Kevin Spacey and even Donald Trump. And now, we’re back on Michael Jackson yet again, and more than usual, it seems.

I know I’ll catch flack for some of my points. But I stress that I’m not against any movement against sex-based crimes or any crime for that matter. I also do not think that the aforementioned men are innocent of their crimes. And yes, there are rapists who happen to be black men, but black men are not rapists by design. So, it shouldn’t come to a surprise why I’m wary about this and other cases given this country’s history grappling with the dangerous and destructive myth of the black male rapist. It’s so strong that mere accusations alone are causes for severe punishment not just for the suspect but entire communities, whether there’s evidence or not. And it should surprise NO ONE that black skin is continuously condemned as this country’s undeniable proof of deviance.

As a citizen of the black community, I want to know when the documentary about Weinstein’s accusations will come to network television. I want to know if there will be damning films about David Bowie, John Lennon or even Charles Dickens. Will we remove their works or anything associated with them from our public institutions? Will we defame them even though they’re no longer here to defend themselves, or are there exceptions to the rule we won’t divulge? Well there be documentaries concerning accusations against them? Will we have to rewrite books based on their lives? Will Oprah do a talk show special with the victims of director Bryan Singer or better yet, Harvey Weinstein?

Do the underlying answers to these questions as well as the whole Neverland fiasco have anything to do with this nation’s eternal mission of protecting whiteness?

A friend of mine from high school said that “it’s” not wrong, unless black people do it. “It” could mean literally anything. In this case, It’s apparently “not as bad”, unless black people do it. “It”, in this case is any form of lawbreaking or contemptible sin. So, it should be understandable why it looks like the media is wrapped heavily about Neverland as opposed to the Weinstein trial.

As someone who felt slighted by a media I thought was more progressive than it is, I wonder why are they so convinced about a movie that has been described as “one-sided” and decided to outright believe it even though it’s deemed problematic from various angles, two of which come from two men, one with a history of changing his stories, and discovered inaccuracies of their testimonies.

Yes, trauma victims can get confused, and their memories can be fractured. But it’s unwise to not consider any suspicion in any case and that there are indeed some people who would stoop low enough to hijack a movement for personal gain. Are Robson and Safechuck such people? That would require investigative journalism and not a drone-like assumption that all who claim victimhood are actual victims.

I know this will spark outrage. I know this isn’t a popular opinion. But if this is what “journalism” and “news” has come down to, I want NO part of it. And this isn’t coming from a “fan” or a “stan”, but someone who expected more from a media I thought was more progressive than this. Michael Jackson, to me, is innocent until proven guilty. Leaving Neverland hasn’t really proved anything and it won’t likely spell the end of Jackson’s legacy, and it’s messed up that some people see it their mission to do so if he was truly innocent. All in all, I greatly doubt such a film or kind of treatment would’ve been made or even supported as much as it is had Jackson been born racially white.

Prove me wrong.

-BrothaWolf  is a blogger from a small town.

Brotha Wolf  Twitter

Note: The author of this blog has graciously granted us permission to repost it in full  – MJJJP

Posted in Leaving Neverland Debunked, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Madame Tussauds Offers Special Admission Price for MJLoveRally Attendees –


Screen Shot 2019-04-23 at 7.26.09 PM

We are pleased to announce that due to our MJLoveRally in front of Madame Tussauds Hollywood, scheduled on June 25th 2019, we have been offered a Special discounted rate of $ 18.00 (Regular price is $30.95 walk-up) by their establishment.

Michael Jackson’s relationship with Madame Tussauds spanned some 25 years starting with his first sitting in 1984 and a visit to the London attraction, with his children in 2005. Jackson has been sculpted six different times and is the most widely exhibited figure in the Madame Tussauds worldwide empire.

This worldwide museum has stood firm in the wake of Leaving Neverland fallout with a statement March 21, 2019 that they would NOT remove our beloved Michael’s exhibit.

“The figures on display at Madame Tussauds reflect profiles that have had an impact on popular culture and that visitors expect to see. Michael Jackson has been and is currently a feature of Madame Tussauds attractions around the world.”

If you’re interested in supporting Madame Tussauds for standing by Michael Jackson, then take advantage of the limited Special Admission Price, only available to MJLoveRally participants, thru MJJJP.

Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 11.13.17 AM

MJJJP has made a special arrangement with Madame Tussauds and reserved a block of 25 tickets for our MJLoveRally participants. It’s First come, First served.  Don’t miss out on this Special – Order your tickets today !!

To reserve your ticket:

Send $18.00 per ticket – via Paypal- candlemel@aol.com-                                                        IMPORTANT: Use option: “Send Money To A Friend”  and you will receive a confirmation of your purchase, and directions on how to collect your reservation number.

We are so excited to meet and greet all of the MJGlobal family who will be attending our Michael Jackson Love March & Rally.

Much love and light !!


Posted in Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

MJEstate -Update on Michael Jackson’s “Don’t Stop” Broadway Show

Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 7.03.29 PMSTATEMENT FROM THE ESTATE
Last week, John Branca, along with Estate attorneys, were invited to speak at Harvard University. They used the opportunity to raise issues about how Leaving Neverland violates every notion of fairness, while pointing out the gaping lies and holes in its narrative. They also spoke with members of the media, such as Billboard, who were present at some of the events [https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8507510/michael-jackson-estate-hits-back-leaving-neverland]. And you can expect more news from the Estate in the coming weeks.

We also remain focused on long-term projects that we believe will enhance Michael’s legacy moving forward, including the Broadway musical. We can assure you that all those involved in this production, including the Tony Award-winning director, Christopher Wheeldon, and the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, Lynn Nottage, are devoted MJ fans. That’s why they are committed to bringing this show to Broadway.

If we get this right – which we will – theater audiences will have an even deeper appreciation for Michael’s creative genius, just as they did when they watched This Is It nearly 10 years ago. In fact, we believe this will be as poignant an experience, one that connects the audience to Michael in a way in which he is appreciated both as a person and as an artist. The role for Lynn and Chris, among other things, is of course to entertain, but also to depict the events of Michael’s life and his struggles, both internal and external, that molded him into the person, the artist and the creative genius that this musical celebrates. Simply put, if we didn’t trust Lynn and Chris to do justice to Michael, we would not be working with them.

While we appreciate that, on an emotional level, fans want Lynn and Chris to join the public battle against Leaving Neverland, from an intellectual perspective we believe it is important to understand why Lynn and Chris, to protect the integrity of the musical, should not take a public position at this time one way or another about any issues in Michael’s life. They are biographers who at this stage have been assigned to dispassionately observe their subject’s life and craft their story. Their role is to entertain as well to understand how all of the events and unique personal challenges Michael faced throughout his life shaped him, and molded the character they ultimately present on stage. The story is still a work-in-progress, as they have stated.

As with the two Cirque du Soleil shows and with Spike Lee’s acclaimed documentaries, we are collaborators. We have significant input and say in the final show. But we believe it is important to give all of our creators the freedom to draw upon Michael’s experiences, in this case, to create a well-rounded and in-depth stage character of Michael Jackson. To that end, we have spent a significant amount of time with them sharing our personal knowledge of Michael and our experiences with him as well as introducing them to others who were an integral part of Michael’s life, so they can fully understand the very complicated and talented artist and man that he was.

Michael was constantly judged throughout his life – as he continues to be in death — by those who never bothered to look below the surface. Lynn and Chris will not do that. They are looking at Michael’s life with the goal of helping audiences understand the challenges and pain he faced away from the spotlight and how it shaped a man who shunned society’s norms to such an extent that 10 years after his passing he still commands the world’s attention. We have asked Lynn and Chris not to give us a superficial Michael, but to delve into his humanity, his goodness and his faults along with the conflicts and difficulties he encountered at different stages of his life, so people can understand what fed the fire of this incredibly unique creative genius. With the benefit of having read drafts of the book, being in the room for readings and being present at labs at which we see the musical coming to life, we see and feel Michael’s presence in a way that we do not think would have been possible with anyone less talented than Lynn and Chris.

A musical of the caliber that we are confident is now taking shape will not only pay tribute to and celebrate Michael Jackson’s genius but take audiences on an emotional journey that will surprise fans and non-fans alike as they witness his magical, complex world. Since we all know it is not possible to judge something that you have not experienced yourself, we hope you will all have the opportunity to sit in the theater and experience this musical for yourselves and we look forward to your reactions once you have that opportunity.


Copyright © 2019 The MJ Online Team on Behalf Of The Estate of Michael Jackson, All rights reserved.
MJOnline The Official Online Team of The Michael Jackson Estate™

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Michael Jackson Innocent/Love March & Rally – June 25th 2019

Screen Shot 2019-04-10 at 9.27.50 AM

This year “Michael Week” takes on a deeper and more personal meaning for the MJGlobal family. Since January, we’ve all been riveted by the ongoing spectacle and quick demise of the fictitious tales of Wade Robson/James Safechuck in Leaving Neverland. Protests from concerned fans from all over the world commenced the moment of it’s presentation at Sundance Film Festival and subsequent airing on HBO, Channel 4 and Oprah Winfrey’s OWN channel.  Currently, it’s reported that ALL three of these entities have prematurely pulled the documentary. 

Our thoughts and prayers are with the MJEstate in their lawsuit against HBO. Keep supporting @tajjackson3 in his endeavor to develop a Michael Jackson Docu Series, that will finally put an end to all of the salacious lies surrounding his beloved uncle.

We, also urge support for another issue on Taj Jackson’s agenda, which is the passing of Anti-Defamation law (ADLLaw) proposed by Anti-Defamation Legacy Law Advocates.

June 25th 2019 MJInnocent/LOVE Rally 

Since the Michael Jackson fanbase is so DIVERSE, MJJJusticeProject  thought it only fitting to have a large gathering while fans from all over the world are visiting Los Angeles in observance of the 10th Commemoration of Michael Jackson’s passing.  Michael Jackson has achieved his goal of immortality and we hope to gather in HONOR of his life and to peacefully demonstrate that we STAND with him in LOVE, especially in hours of tribulation.

This is a LOVE March & Rally in honor of our beloved Michael. Our intent is to have a Peaceful gathering of his world-wide fans to demonstrate his message of Peace, Love and Brotherhood.

Please register at MJLoveRally so that we may organize and you may receive a Group Photo. Donate to this endeavor at PayPal candlemel@aol.com

Itinerary June 25, 2019

6:00pm     Meet outside Holiday Inn Express: 1921 N Highland Ave, LosAngeles, CA

6-6:20pm Fans Signing Love Banner entitled “MJ♥️Rally”

6:30pm    Arrange in groups with Team Captains, prepare for walk

6:45pm    Walk from Hotel to Madame Tussauds  – (see map below)

7:00pm    Speech & Intro of  LA Zombies

7:15pm    LAZombies will perform to TWO Michael Jackson’s songs

7:40pm   Speech by Keen Zhang & Intro of MJChinese impersonator Wang Jinguyan 

8:00pm   Group Photo of Attendees & Signing of  “MJ♥️Rally” Banner

8:30pm  Event disassembly


Walk-map from Holiday Inn Express to Madame Tussauds

NOTE: Walk route MAY CHANGE depending on what activities are ongoing at the time of our rally- but any change of route will NOT change the length of the walk. 

Screen Shot 2019-04-10 at 11.38.34 AM.png

NOTICE                                                                                                                               *****SPECIAL -ADMISSION PRICE for Madame Tussauds******

Screen Shot 2019-04-23 at 7.26.09 PM


We are pleased to announce that due to our MJLoveRally in front of Madame Tussauds Hollywood we have been offered a Special discounted rate of $ 18.00 (regular price is $30.95 walk-up)

Michael Jackson’s relationship with Madame Tussauds spanned some 25 years starting with his first sitting in 1984 and a visit to the London attraction, with his children in 2005. Jackson has been sculpted six different times and is the most widely exhibited figure in the Madame Tussauds worldwide empire.

This worldwide museum has stood firm in the wake of Leaving Neverland fallout with a statement March 21, 2019 that they would NOT remove our beloved Michael’s exhibit.

“The figures on display at Madame Tussauds reflect profiles that have had an impact on popular culture and that visitors expect to see. Michael Jackson has been and is currently a feature of Madame Tussauds attractions around the world.”

If you’re interested in taking advantage of the Special admission price:

Send $18.00 via candlemel@aol.com then collect your tickets at Holiday Inn Express from Melanie Freeman, June 25th, 2019 by 6:20pm before we begin our march.

We’ve reserved a pre-paid block of 25 tickets for our MJLoveRally participants, so it’s a first come first serve.  Don’t miss out on this special – Order your tickets today !!                            Pls NOTE: This is a prepaid special offer made expressly with MJJJP, once purchased there will no refunds available.

*****UPDATE *****

In Honor of Michael Jackson


In keeping with the Michael Jackson Estate campaign #HonorMJ ; to do things with Michael in mind, to help a community, a charity, or an individual- MJJJusticeProject is asking participants of the June 25th 2019, MJ Love Rally to donate children’s books that will be delivered to Ronald McDonald house June 26th.

Books will take up very little space in your luggage and will be a gift that will keep on giving as time passes. The children at Ronald McDonald house will surely appreciate this gift and we will include a label inside each book that it was donated in honor of Michael Jackson from his World-wide community.

We encourage you to tweet out a photo of your book with the hashtag #HonorMJ on June 25th via Twitter- post it on Facebook or any other social media available to you. Be sure to share it with us @MJJJusticePrjct – 💕

There are THREE ways to make sure your books get donated to Ronald McDonald House.

You may bring the children book/books at 6pm- June 25th -to the Holiday Inn Express on Highland Avenue before our MJ Love Rally begins. OR

You may bring the book/books to Forest Lawn June 25th and give them to MJJJP team member, Buds personally-She will be at Forest Lawn from 11:30 -2:00pm

You many bring the book/books to Sizzler at 2920 Los Feliz, Los Angeles, CA and give them to MJJJP team member Melanie, who will be there from 1:00 to 3:00pm—

Much love and light

******************************* Please Note *********************************** 

Please wear MJ Innocent Tee-Shirt or ANY other favorite Michael Jackson Tee.

Please bring a small flag of your country for representation during the walk.

If interested in being a Team Captain please indicate when you register.

Los Angeles is Arid- June temperatures vary from 80degree day /62 degrees at night. Dress in layers or bring a jacket if you plan to visit Michael’s Star in the night, after the Love Rally disassembles. Stay hydrated.

Group Photo will be sent to the email used when registering for this event.

The MJ♥️ Rally Banner with the love messages from his fans, will be taken to Neverland in Los Olivos, CA on June 26th for photograph at the Gate and then delivered to Michael’s children afterward.

Donations are appreciated but not mandatory. Monies will be used to buy banners, signs, posters, insurance and permits. Pls use PayPal candlemel@aol.com


  • Itinerary & Info may be updated/changed as we near the date
  • Please keep checking in. 💕
  • Update April 12th -So far we have fans from UK, France, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Sweden, Russia, Italy, Germany and USA joining in this GLOBAL Love Fest of support for our beloved Michael – Join us!!  😘                                                   Register at  
Posted in Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Safechuck alleges sexual abuse at the iconic Neverland train station that did not even exist at the time

This gallery contains 16 photos.

Originally posted on The Michael Jackson Allegations:
In a scene of Leaving Neverland accuser James Safechuck alleges that Michael Jackson had molested him in virtually every corner of Neverland, including in open and rather public spaces such as the pool…

More Galleries | Leave a comment

Tale Of A Train Station – James Safechuck’s Abuse Story, in Leaving Neverland, Doesn’t Add Up

From Reclaiming Neverland Facebook –  
👑While the TALE OF A TRAIN STATION has been told many times now on social media, including on this very page (and meanwhile by Mike Smallcombe in mass media as well, http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-TRAIN-STATION), we thought it should get its own note in order to collect the bits and pieces and put some dates on them.
👑Document History
👑First published: March 29 (late).
👑Update March 30: According to http://bit.ly/TRAIN-STATION-REMOVED-FRANCE, the Train Station segment was not in the documentary as shown by M6 in France.
👑Update March 30: Added a Land Use Permit dated September 2, 1993 (credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-LAND-USE-PERMIT).
👑March 31: Added a Dan Reed quote (http://bit.ly/REED-BUZZFEED) below HOMEADVERTS photo.
👑March 31: Added a screenshot of a Mike Smallcombe tweet below paragraph beginning “We seize this opportunity…”.
👑March 31: Added a Mike Smallcombe quote (http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-NME-GRAND-CANYON) at the end.
👑March 31: Added an extended Addendum at the end regarding Dan Reed trying to salvage what’s left by claiming the alleged abuse in the Train Station took place after it was built, i.e. in 1994.
👑March 31: Added 60 Minutes video with Thomas Mesereau defending MJ at the end.
“We didn’t come across anything that would undermine or challenge James’ account.”
Dan Reed, in: Inside The Controversial Michael Jackson Documentary “Leaving Neverland”, Buzzfeed, March 3, 2019 –

👑James Safechuck states the following in Leaving Neverland:

“At the train station, there is a room upstairs, and we would have sex up there, too. It would happen every day. It sounds sick but it’s kind of like when you are first dating somebody, right, and you do a lot of it. So, it was very much like that.” 

👑 You can verify the quote using this video (http://bit.ly/RN-TRAIN-STATION):
Always Verify.
👑In fact, you should always verify what is said on social media as sometimes, it’s not quite correct and repeating and spreading it might discredit fans and supporters.
👑As you can see in the video clip (http://bit.ly/RN-TRAIN-STATION), Leaving Neverland shows pictures of the interior of the train station to support James Safechuck’s claims visually. Visuals – as well as music – help getting a message across and appeal to the imagination of one’s audience.
👑And since James Safechuck states that the alleged abuse happened in the upstairs room of the train station, a picture of the staircase is shown which proves there is a room upstairs – where there is a staircase, there is a room upstairs – right?
👑Remember that according to its creator, Leaving Neverland is a well researched documentary – so since that thing with the room upstairs seems right as diligent research has shown there is a staircase – CORROBORATION1! PROOF! – The rest of the story must be right, too! – Not so fast, though…
👑While this is not the photo used in Leaving Neverland, in no way do we wish to be less diligent and thus show you some proof as well – there is indeed an upstairs room. But what exactly does this prove? If we had told you previously that Michael was storing office supplies in the room upstairs, by the same mechanism, that staircase proves that, too!

The Existence Of A Staircase Proves Just About EVERYTHING.
👑This just serves to show how the audience is manipulated by Leaving Neverland. It’s like, yes, James Safechuck’s story is corroborated – there is a room upstairs, so… – and the imagination of the audience, led by the director, takes precedence over their critical thinking.
👑In order to find an answer to our question – what exactly does this prove – you need to do more than providing proof the Train Station had an upstairs room: You need to get into numbers, math, legal matters and official documents.
👑James Safechuck states in Leaving Neverland that the alleged abuse ended when he was 14. Now let’s do some calculations here: James Safechuck was born on February 28, 1978 so he turned 14 on February 28, 1992 and 15 on February 28, 1993.
👑Also, in his lawsuit, James Safechuck states that the alleged ongoing abuse occurred between 1988 and 1992.

James Safechuck, Second Amended Complaint, Filed September 19, 2016.
👑In Leaving Neverland, James Safechuck appears to place the alleged abuse in the room upstairs towards the beginning of the abuse (“when you are first dating”, credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-EARLY).
Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 12.47.22 PM.png
👑Moreover, James Safechuck appears to refer to the abuse being ongoing (“every day”) so that should place the alleged abuse inside the Train Station within the time frame 1988 to 1992 as well – if we are allowed to correlate this with what he states in his lawsuit (in these matters, sometimes, I think we are not supposed to consider lawsuit material as real).
👑The train station, however, was still under construction on December 13, 1993 as you can see in this AP image; the picture was taken the day before the article appeared (see the text below the picture; credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-TRAIN-STATION).

Under Construction December 13, 1993
👑This is the Land Use Permit dated September 2, 1993 – it can’t get any more official (credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-LAND-USE-PERMIT; screenshot added March 30).

A Boring and Aesthetically Unpleasing Land Use Permit Can Very Well Turn Out To Be A Smoking Gun At Some Stage In The Future – Never Underestimate The Power Of Land Use Permits!
👑While it might be possible to argue that tour dates and hotel rooms can be easily confused and wrongly remembered, especially when related to alleged traumatizing events – how can you get confused about something that did not exist the entire time (1988-1992) you claim the alleged abuse took place – “every day”? This must clearly be a product of imagination – or, put less favorably, fabrication.

👑We have seen the word “fabrication” before, just today – namely, here, when Mike Smallcombe dissects the TALE OF A GRAND CANYON:

“All of this shows that Wade’s story about being abused that first time, while the rest of his family had supposedly left the ranch to go to the Grand Canyon, is false. Of course, while this doesn’t categorically rule out that Jackson abused Wade Robson, it does make you wonder if this extremely detailed and key story in the documentary has been fabricated.” http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-MIRROR-GRAND-CANYON

👑We seize this opportunity to point out how important it is that knowledgeable persons like Mike Smallcombe have their pieces published in outlets like the Mirror as these are the places where the actual audience can be found which needs to be reached (incidentally, this particular piece was republished in the Sun).
👑This here shows the audience of these publications is reached and is interested in reading these articles (this tweet refers to the TALE OF A GRAND CANYON):

The General Audience Is Reached.
👑Adding a section on curiosities, we noticed that this tale appears to be quite perplexing for defenders of Leaving Neverland. We base this observation on attempts at explaining it like the following one – please pause and imagine the loft area “in that vaulted roof” for a moment. And does this look like a train station to you?

The Train Depot Is Imagined As Having A Loft Area “In That Vaulted Roof”.
👑Well, there is a lot of fixing to do in the past to make this work. Better get the DeLorean ready, Dan, Wade and James.

Unknown Fan – If You See This, Notify Us So We Can Credit You.

~Always remember: Where there is a staircase,
there is a room upstairs – PROOF!~

👑About the far reaching significance of A TALE OF A TRAIN STATION and A TALE OF A GRAND CANYON (the latter not covered in this note – for this tale, please refer to Mike Smallcombe’s articles quoted throughout this note):
“Speaking to NME today (March 31), Smallcombe added: “These are two extremely detailed and key stories in the documentary – especially in the case of Wade Robson – which have been provably fabricated. And while this doesn’t categorically rule out that Jackson abused them, it does make you wonder, if they’ve fabricated these stories, what about the rest?” http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-NME-GRAND-CANYON
👑We concur.
👑ADDENDUM: Dan Reed concedes Train Station dates are correct – but now says the abuse ended only after the train station had been built (1994).

Facts Don’t Lie. People Do.
👑Consider that James Safechuck states in his lawsuit the alleged ongoing abuse began in 1988 and ended in 1992 (for exhibit, see above).
👑James Safechuck was born on February 28, 1978 so he turned 14 on February 28, 1992, 15 on February 28, 1993 and 16 (!) on February 28, 1994.

👑In this radio interview, Dan Reed states that Michael routinely lost interest in boys when they were 14/15:

“You got to bear in mind that the age, the age that Michael, you know, routinely lost interest in little boys that you saw, the age that he lost interest was around 14, 15 so Aaron was not of an age that Michael would have been interested in anyway.”

👑In Leaving Neverland, James Safechuck places the alleged abuse in the Train Station during the time the alleged sexual abuse would happen on an ongoing basis (every day) and even places it towards the beginning of the time frame in question (first dating).
“At the train station, there is a room upstairs, and we would have sex up there, too. It would happen every day. It sounds sick but it’s kind of like when you are *first dating* somebody, right, and you do a lot of it. So, it was very much like that.”
👑James Safechuck in 1994 – watch out for the pink umbrella. – Lisa Marie Presley is there, too.
👑James Safechuck in his Second Amended Complaint expressly states that the alleged abuse ended once he reached puberty (also states that Michael remained active in his life). Please read the entire complaint under http://bit.ly/SAFECHUCK-SECOND-AMENDED-COMPLAINT as we don’t wish to be called out for only providing snippets and thus manipulating the evidence – REMEMBER, ALWAYS VERIFY!

The Alleged Sexual Abuse Stopped Once He Reached Puberty – Says James Safechuck. We Guess It’s Time That Dan And James Sit Down For A Chat.
Thomas Mesereau Now Defends Michael in The Court Of Media.
Posted in Leaving Neverland Debunked, Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tale Of A Train Station – James Safechuck’s Abuse Story, in Leaving Neverland, Doesn’t Add Up

Statement from MJEstate -March 18, 2019

Screen Shot 2018-06-12 at 10.49.00 PM

Hello, MJFam:
The last few weeks have been a challenge for everyone who loves Michael. Many of you have been asking for an update from the Estate, and I have the following statement to share.

We want to start by again thanking all of Michael’s fans and acknowledge and thank Michael’s nephew, Taj, his niece, Brandi, and his brothers, Jackie, Marlon and Tito, Grace Rwaramba, Aaron Carter, Brett Barnes, Stephanie Mills and all of the other individuals around the world who have spoken out on his behalf. We also want to acknowledge those in the media who have done their job as journalists by reviewing the facts, noting how they were ignored in Leaving Neverland because it didn’t fit into the filmmaker’s one-sided agenda of denigrating Michael’s legacy.

We also want to provide a brief update on our efforts, as well as share some thoughts with you from the past two weeks. We share your frustration and anger that a man who was found innocent in a court of law in life is being attacked, financially exploited and smeared by corporations and individuals who are only making claims now because he is no longer here to defend himself.

In addition to our public statements regarding our position on Leaving Neverland, our legal efforts continue. While it would not be prudent to publicly divulge our strategy and list our efforts, rest assured we are committed to holding HBO and Channel 4 accountable for their egregious, uncorroborated smear of Michael’s legacy. Many of you have asked why we are seeking open arbitration. The answer is simple: we believe the public deserves to know how Leaving Neverland really came about, why no counter opinion was ever sought, why so many facts were ignored and why individuals were smeared who should have at a minimum been contacted to get the other side of the story. It is outrageous that such a one-sided smear was ever allowed on the air without challenge. We all know that if Michael was still alive it would never have been aired. 

We also have other non-legal initiatives that we will disclose at the appropriate time. What is important for us, and always has been, is that we continue to take the long view as we have over the last decade. That means not doing anything rash that would give HBO, Channel 4, the film’s director and, especially, the subjects of the film, what they most crave now. They want to engage in a way that focuses more attention on a film that has no doubt underperformed given that the media did everything in its power to sell this film to viewers. But given the enormous attention and free publicity the media gave this film, the numbers have clearly not matched the hype in the markets where it has aired, with many viewers opting to stop watching after the first part.

We recognize that the press often magnifies each affront related to this film. But from our view the actual impact of this documentary on the public and their behavior has not been as significant as the media want people to think. While some would like you to think otherwise, we can confirm that the consumption of Michael’s music has not declined and his streaming numbers have not decreased in the wake of this documentary. This tells us that in addition to those of us who know the truth about Michael, those who may not understand Michael’s eccentricities and the way he chose to live his life outside of society’s norms are still choosing to appreciate and enjoy the art he created. We have licensees worldwide who are proudly selling Michael Jackson merchandise. We have insight into a significant amount of data that the fans do not see and we are working 24/7 behind the scenes to synthesize all that information and act accordingly. 

We are also seeing a sharp disconnect between the reception of the film by everyday viewers and the mainstream media. Despite being outright propaganda, many viewers see through the one-sidedness, the over-the-top salacious claims, the staged dialogue and other dramatizations. They see that what Leaving Neverland boils down to is a sales job aimed at convincing viewers Michael Jackson isn’t the man millions of people know and love, including the two subjects of the film and their families until they chose to sue for hundreds of millions of dollars. As people have had time to digest Leaving Neverland and review the facts, many are recognizing they can’t take it at face value. We are especially proud of Michael’s fans and those who continue to stand up for him by pointing out the numerous inconsistencies and flaws in the film. Numerous individuals who have studied every facet of these cases has poked numerous holes in the stories of the two subjects. Some critics and individuals are now courageously admitting publicly that, having studied the facts, their view of the film changed 180 degrees.

Michael Jackson cannot be silenced, and neither can his fans, whether it is those who proudly play his music in public squares to show their support, the coffee shop owner in New Zealand who played his songs all day long in protest of Leaving Neverland or those who put posters and signs around cities proclaiming his innocence. As Michael predicted 25 years ago, the truth will be his salvation.

The Estate of Michael Jackson

Thank you for your continued support of Michael and his legacy.


The Official Online Team of The Michael Jackson Estate™

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Differences Between Leaving Neverland/interviews and the Robson/Safechuck lawsuits

How Many Versions of the Truth can There BE?– Wade Robson & James Safechuck Multiple Versions of Abuse Add Up to a MONEY GRAB-

The Michael Jackson Allegations

While the story in “Leaving Neverland” is based on Wade Robson and James Safechuck’s lawsuits, there are some differences between the film, their interviews during the promotional campaign of the film and their complaints. Here I will post a list of those differences:

1) In the film Wade Robson makes the allegation that Michael Jackson made him get rid of a bloody underwear after attempting to anally penetrate him when Wade was 14.

Robson does claim the anal penetration attempt in the court filing, but does not claim anything about a bloody underwear and Jackson allegedly making him get rid of it. This is all that is alleged in the complaint about the alleged anal penetration [1]:

Is this yet another example of Wade Robson’s ever evolving “memories”?

2)In interviews during the promotional campaign of the film, James Safechuck made an allegation that Jackson supposedly made a video tape…

View original post 1,853 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What about Jackson’s sharing his bedroom with unrelated children?

Reblog of MJ Allegations – Michael Jackson’s “Bedroom” Bigger than Most US two story Townhomes and WHY that matters —

The Michael Jackson Allegations

Some people base their own “guilty” verdict about Michael Jackson on his own statement of seeing nothing wrong with sharing a bed with unrelated children. To be sure, we do not advocate this behavior (that directly led to The 2005 Allegations) and it definitely was not Jackson’s wisest decision to share his bedroom with unrelated children. It is understandable why this makes people feel uncomfortable. Accompanied with his wealth, fame, naivety and eccentricities, it also made him a vulnerable target to these kind of allegations. Here we would like to offer some context to this topic.

Possibly the biggest publicity backlash that Jackson has received because of this “sharing bed” issue was after the airing of the 2003 Martin Bashir documentary, Living with Michael Jackson. In that interview the star talked about “sharing bed” with children. The infamous scene featured Jackson and his later accuser Gavin Arvizo holding hands…

View original post 2,957 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment