Michael Jackson Innocent/Love March & Rally – June 25th 2019

Screen Shot 2019-04-10 at 9.27.50 AM

This year “Michael Week” takes on a deeper and more personal meaning for the MJGlobal family. Since January, we’ve all been riveted by the ongoing spectacle and quick demise of the fictitious tales of Wade Robson/James Safechuck in Leaving Neverland. Protests from concerned fans from all over the world commenced the moment of it’s presentation at Sundance Film Festival and subsequent airing on HBO, Channel 4 and Oprah Winfrey’s OWN channel.  Currently, it’s reported that ALL three of these entities have prematurely pulled the documentary. 

Our thoughts and prayers are with the MJEstate in their lawsuit against HBO. Keep supporting @tajjackson3 in his endeavor to develop a Michael Jackson Docu Series, that will finally put an end to all of the salacious lies surrounding his beloved uncle.

We, also urge support for another issue on Taj Jackson’s agenda, which is the passing of Anti-Defamation law (ADLLaw) proposed by Anti-Defamation Legacy Law Advocates.

June 25th 2019 MJInnocent/LOVE Rally 

Since the Michael Jackson fanbase is so DIVERSE, MJJJusticeProject  thought it only fitting to have a large gathering while fans from all over the world are visiting Los Angeles in observance of the 10th Commemoration of Michael Jackson’s passing.  Michael Jackson has achieved his goal of immortality and we hope to gather in HONOR of his life and to peacefully demonstrate that we STAND with him in LOVE, especially in hours of tribulation.

This is a LOVE March & Rally in honor of our beloved Michael. Our intent is to have a Peaceful gathering of his world-wide fans to demonstrate his message of Peace, Love and Brotherhood.

Please register at MJLoveRally so that we may organize and you may receive a Group Photo. Donate to this endeavor at PayPal candlemel@aol.com

Itinerary June 25, 2019

6:00pm     Meet outside Holiday Inn Express: 1921 N Highland Ave, LosAngeles, CA

6-6:20pm Fans Signing Love Banner entitled “Reclaiming Neverland”

6:30pm    Arrange in groups with Team Captains, prepare for walk

6:45pm    Walk from Hotel to Madame Tussauds  – (see map below)

7:00pm    Speech & Intro of  LA Zombies

7:15pm    LAZombies will perform to TWO Michael Jackson’s songs

7:40pm   Speech by Keen Zhang & Intro of MJChinese impersonator Wang Jinguyan 

8:00pm   Group Photo of Attendees & Signing of “Reclaiming Neverland Banner”

8:30pm  Event disassembly

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Walk-map from Holiday Inn Express to Madame Tussauds

Screen Shot 2019-04-10 at 11.38.34 AM.png

Please Note:  

Please wear MJ Innocent Tee-Shirt or ANY other favorite Michael Jackson Tee.

Please bring a small flag of your country for representation during the walk.

If interested in being a Team Captain please indicate when you register.

Los Angeles is Arid- June temperatures vary from 80degree day /62 degrees at night. Dress in layers or bring a jacket if you plan to visit Michael’s Star in the night, after the Love Rally disassembles.

Group Photo will be sent to the email used when registering for this event.

The Reclaiming Neverland Banner with the love messages from his fans, will be taken to Neverland in Los Olivos, CA on June 26th for photograph at the Gate and then delivered to Michael’s children afterward.

Donations are appreciated but not mandatory. Monies will be used to buy banners, signs, posters, insurance and permits. Pls use PayPal candlemel@aol.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • Itinerary Info may be updated/changed as we near the date
  • Please keep checking in. 💕
  • Update April 12th -So far we have fans from UK, France, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Sweden, Russia, Italy, Germany and USA joining in this GLOBAL Love Fest of support for our beloved Michael – Join us!!  😘                                                   Register at  
Posted in Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Safechuck alleges sexual abuse at the iconic Neverland train station that did not even exist at the time

This gallery contains 16 photos.

Originally posted on The Michael Jackson Allegations:
In a scene of Leaving Neverland accuser James Safechuck alleges that Michael Jackson had molested him in virtually every corner of Neverland, including in open and rather public spaces such as the pool…

Gallery | Leave a comment

Tale Of A Train Station – James Safechuck’s Abuse Story, in Leaving Neverland, Doesn’t Add Up

From Reclaiming Neverland Facebook –  
👑While the TALE OF A TRAIN STATION has been told many times now on social media, including on this very page (and meanwhile by Mike Smallcombe in mass media as well, http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-TRAIN-STATION), we thought it should get its own note in order to collect the bits and pieces and put some dates on them.
                                      👑👑👑
👑Document History
👑First published: March 29 (late).
👑Update March 30: According to http://bit.ly/TRAIN-STATION-REMOVED-FRANCE, the Train Station segment was not in the documentary as shown by M6 in France.
👑Update March 30: Added a Land Use Permit dated September 2, 1993 (credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-LAND-USE-PERMIT).
👑March 31: Added a Dan Reed quote (http://bit.ly/REED-BUZZFEED) below HOMEADVERTS photo.
👑March 31: Added a screenshot of a Mike Smallcombe tweet below paragraph beginning “We seize this opportunity…”.
👑March 31: Added a Mike Smallcombe quote (http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-NME-GRAND-CANYON) at the end.
👑March 31: Added an extended Addendum at the end regarding Dan Reed trying to salvage what’s left by claiming the alleged abuse in the Train Station took place after it was built, i.e. in 1994.
👑March 31: Changed title from A TALE OF A TRAIN STATION to A (NEVERENDING) TALE OF A TRAIN STATION.
👑March 31: Added 60 Minutes video with Thomas Mesereau defending MJ at the end.
                                        👑👑👑
“We didn’t come across anything that would undermine or challenge James’ account.”
Dan Reed, in: Inside The Controversial Michael Jackson Documentary “Leaving Neverland”, Buzzfeed, March 3, 2019 –
http://bit.ly/REED-BUZZFEED
                                       👑👑👑

👑James Safechuck states the following in Leaving Neverland:

“At the train station, there is a room upstairs, and we would have sex up there, too. It would happen every day. It sounds sick but it’s kind of like when you are first dating somebody, right, and you do a lot of it. So, it was very much like that.” 

👑 You can verify the quote using this video (http://bit.ly/RN-TRAIN-STATION):
Always Verify.
👑In fact, you should always verify what is said on social media as sometimes, it’s not quite correct and repeating and spreading it might discredit fans and supporters.
👑As you can see in the video clip (http://bit.ly/RN-TRAIN-STATION), Leaving Neverland shows pictures of the interior of the train station to support James Safechuck’s claims visually. Visuals – as well as music – help getting a message across and appeal to the imagination of one’s audience.
👑And since James Safechuck states that the alleged abuse happened in the upstairs room of the train station, a picture of the staircase is shown which proves there is a room upstairs – where there is a staircase, there is a room upstairs – right?
👑Remember that according to its creator, Leaving Neverland is a well researched documentary – so since that thing with the room upstairs seems right as diligent research has shown there is a staircase – CORROBORATION1! PROOF! – The rest of the story must be right, too! – Not so fast, though…
👑While this is not the photo used in Leaving Neverland, in no way do we wish to be less diligent and thus show you some proof as well – there is indeed an upstairs room. But what exactly does this prove? If we had told you previously that Michael was storing office supplies in the room upstairs, by the same mechanism, that staircase proves that, too!

The Existence Of A Staircase Proves Just About EVERYTHING.
👑This just serves to show how the audience is manipulated by Leaving Neverland. It’s like, yes, James Safechuck’s story is corroborated – there is a room upstairs, so… – and the imagination of the audience, led by the director, takes precedence over their critical thinking.
👑In order to find an answer to our question – what exactly does this prove – you need to do more than providing proof the Train Station had an upstairs room: You need to get into numbers, math, legal matters and official documents.
👑James Safechuck states in Leaving Neverland that the alleged abuse ended when he was 14. Now let’s do some calculations here: James Safechuck was born on February 28, 1978 so he turned 14 on February 28, 1992 and 15 on February 28, 1993.
👑Also, in his lawsuit, James Safechuck states that the alleged ongoing abuse occurred between 1988 and 1992.

James Safechuck, Second Amended Complaint, Filed September 19, 2016.
👑In Leaving Neverland, James Safechuck appears to place the alleged abuse in the room upstairs towards the beginning of the abuse (“when you are first dating”, credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-EARLY).
Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 12.47.22 PM.png
👑Moreover, James Safechuck appears to refer to the abuse being ongoing (“every day”) so that should place the alleged abuse inside the Train Station within the time frame 1988 to 1992 as well – if we are allowed to correlate this with what he states in his lawsuit (in these matters, sometimes, I think we are not supposed to consider lawsuit material as real).
👑The train station, however, was still under construction on December 13, 1993 as you can see in this AP image; the picture was taken the day before the article appeared (see the text below the picture; credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-TRAIN-STATION).

Under Construction December 13, 1993
👑This is the Land Use Permit dated September 2, 1993 – it can’t get any more official (credit: http://bit.ly/MJJREPOSITORY-LAND-USE-PERMIT; screenshot added March 30).

A Boring and Aesthetically Unpleasing Land Use Permit Can Very Well Turn Out To Be A Smoking Gun At Some Stage In The Future – Never Underestimate The Power Of Land Use Permits!
👑While it might be possible to argue that tour dates and hotel rooms can be easily confused and wrongly remembered, especially when related to alleged traumatizing events – how can you get confused about something that did not exist the entire time (1988-1992) you claim the alleged abuse took place – “every day”? This must clearly be a product of imagination – or, put less favorably, fabrication.

👑We have seen the word “fabrication” before, just today – namely, here, when Mike Smallcombe dissects the TALE OF A GRAND CANYON:

“All of this shows that Wade’s story about being abused that first time, while the rest of his family had supposedly left the ranch to go to the Grand Canyon, is false. Of course, while this doesn’t categorically rule out that Jackson abused Wade Robson, it does make you wonder if this extremely detailed and key story in the documentary has been fabricated.” http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-MIRROR-GRAND-CANYON

👑We seize this opportunity to point out how important it is that knowledgeable persons like Mike Smallcombe have their pieces published in outlets like the Mirror as these are the places where the actual audience can be found which needs to be reached (incidentally, this particular piece was republished in the Sun).
👑This here shows the audience of these publications is reached and is interested in reading these articles (this tweet refers to the TALE OF A GRAND CANYON):

The General Audience Is Reached.
👑Adding a section on curiosities, we noticed that this tale appears to be quite perplexing for defenders of Leaving Neverland. We base this observation on attempts at explaining it like the following one – please pause and imagine the loft area “in that vaulted roof” for a moment. And does this look like a train station to you?

The Train Depot Is Imagined As Having A Loft Area “In That Vaulted Roof”.
👑Well, there is a lot of fixing to do in the past to make this work. Better get the DeLorean ready, Dan, Wade and James.

Unknown Fan – If You See This, Notify Us So We Can Credit You.

~Always remember: Where there is a staircase,
there is a room upstairs – PROOF!~

                                       👑👑👑
👑About the far reaching significance of A TALE OF A TRAIN STATION and A TALE OF A GRAND CANYON (the latter not covered in this note – for this tale, please refer to Mike Smallcombe’s articles quoted throughout this note):
“Speaking to NME today (March 31), Smallcombe added: “These are two extremely detailed and key stories in the documentary – especially in the case of Wade Robson – which have been provably fabricated. And while this doesn’t categorically rule out that Jackson abused them, it does make you wonder, if they’ve fabricated these stories, what about the rest?” http://bit.ly/SMALLCOMBE-NME-GRAND-CANYON
👑We concur.
                                      👑👑👑
👑ADDENDUM: Dan Reed concedes Train Station dates are correct – but now says the abuse ended only after the train station had been built (1994).

Facts Don’t Lie. People Do.
👑Consider that James Safechuck states in his lawsuit the alleged ongoing abuse began in 1988 and ended in 1992 (for exhibit, see above).
👑James Safechuck was born on February 28, 1978 so he turned 14 on February 28, 1992, 15 on February 28, 1993 and 16 (!) on February 28, 1994.

👑In this radio interview, Dan Reed states that Michael routinely lost interest in boys when they were 14/15:

“You got to bear in mind that the age, the age that Michael, you know, routinely lost interest in little boys that you saw, the age that he lost interest was around 14, 15 so Aaron was not of an age that Michael would have been interested in anyway.”
http://bit.ly/DAN-REED-AARON-CARTER-WAS-TOO-OLD

👑In Leaving Neverland, James Safechuck places the alleged abuse in the Train Station during the time the alleged sexual abuse would happen on an ongoing basis (every day) and even places it towards the beginning of the time frame in question (first dating).
“At the train station, there is a room upstairs, and we would have sex up there, too. It would happen every day. It sounds sick but it’s kind of like when you are *first dating* somebody, right, and you do a lot of it. So, it was very much like that.”
👑James Safechuck in 1994 – watch out for the pink umbrella. – Lisa Marie Presley is there, too.
👑James Safechuck in his Second Amended Complaint expressly states that the alleged abuse ended once he reached puberty (also states that Michael remained active in his life). Please read the entire complaint under http://bit.ly/SAFECHUCK-SECOND-AMENDED-COMPLAINT as we don’t wish to be called out for only providing snippets and thus manipulating the evidence – REMEMBER, ALWAYS VERIFY!

The Alleged Sexual Abuse Stopped Once He Reached Puberty – Says James Safechuck. We Guess It’s Time That Dan And James Sit Down For A Chat.
                                       👑👑👑
Thomas Mesereau Now Defends Michael in The Court Of Media.
                                       👑👑👑
Source: 👑RECLAIMING NEVERLAND
http://bit.ly/RN-TALE-OF-A-TRAIN-STATION
Posted in Leaving Neverland Debunked, Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Statement from MJEstate -March 18, 2019

Screen Shot 2018-06-12 at 10.49.00 PM

Hello, MJFam:
The last few weeks have been a challenge for everyone who loves Michael. Many of you have been asking for an update from the Estate, and I have the following statement to share.

We want to start by again thanking all of Michael’s fans and acknowledge and thank Michael’s nephew, Taj, his niece, Brandi, and his brothers, Jackie, Marlon and Tito, Grace Rwaramba, Aaron Carter, Brett Barnes, Stephanie Mills and all of the other individuals around the world who have spoken out on his behalf. We also want to acknowledge those in the media who have done their job as journalists by reviewing the facts, noting how they were ignored in Leaving Neverland because it didn’t fit into the filmmaker’s one-sided agenda of denigrating Michael’s legacy.

We also want to provide a brief update on our efforts, as well as share some thoughts with you from the past two weeks. We share your frustration and anger that a man who was found innocent in a court of law in life is being attacked, financially exploited and smeared by corporations and individuals who are only making claims now because he is no longer here to defend himself.

In addition to our public statements regarding our position on Leaving Neverland, our legal efforts continue. While it would not be prudent to publicly divulge our strategy and list our efforts, rest assured we are committed to holding HBO and Channel 4 accountable for their egregious, uncorroborated smear of Michael’s legacy. Many of you have asked why we are seeking open arbitration. The answer is simple: we believe the public deserves to know how Leaving Neverland really came about, why no counter opinion was ever sought, why so many facts were ignored and why individuals were smeared who should have at a minimum been contacted to get the other side of the story. It is outrageous that such a one-sided smear was ever allowed on the air without challenge. We all know that if Michael was still alive it would never have been aired. 

We also have other non-legal initiatives that we will disclose at the appropriate time. What is important for us, and always has been, is that we continue to take the long view as we have over the last decade. That means not doing anything rash that would give HBO, Channel 4, the film’s director and, especially, the subjects of the film, what they most crave now. They want to engage in a way that focuses more attention on a film that has no doubt underperformed given that the media did everything in its power to sell this film to viewers. But given the enormous attention and free publicity the media gave this film, the numbers have clearly not matched the hype in the markets where it has aired, with many viewers opting to stop watching after the first part.

We recognize that the press often magnifies each affront related to this film. But from our view the actual impact of this documentary on the public and their behavior has not been as significant as the media want people to think. While some would like you to think otherwise, we can confirm that the consumption of Michael’s music has not declined and his streaming numbers have not decreased in the wake of this documentary. This tells us that in addition to those of us who know the truth about Michael, those who may not understand Michael’s eccentricities and the way he chose to live his life outside of society’s norms are still choosing to appreciate and enjoy the art he created. We have licensees worldwide who are proudly selling Michael Jackson merchandise. We have insight into a significant amount of data that the fans do not see and we are working 24/7 behind the scenes to synthesize all that information and act accordingly. 

We are also seeing a sharp disconnect between the reception of the film by everyday viewers and the mainstream media. Despite being outright propaganda, many viewers see through the one-sidedness, the over-the-top salacious claims, the staged dialogue and other dramatizations. They see that what Leaving Neverland boils down to is a sales job aimed at convincing viewers Michael Jackson isn’t the man millions of people know and love, including the two subjects of the film and their families until they chose to sue for hundreds of millions of dollars. As people have had time to digest Leaving Neverland and review the facts, many are recognizing they can’t take it at face value. We are especially proud of Michael’s fans and those who continue to stand up for him by pointing out the numerous inconsistencies and flaws in the film. Numerous individuals who have studied every facet of these cases has poked numerous holes in the stories of the two subjects. Some critics and individuals are now courageously admitting publicly that, having studied the facts, their view of the film changed 180 degrees.

Michael Jackson cannot be silenced, and neither can his fans, whether it is those who proudly play his music in public squares to show their support, the coffee shop owner in New Zealand who played his songs all day long in protest of Leaving Neverland or those who put posters and signs around cities proclaiming his innocence. As Michael predicted 25 years ago, the truth will be his salvation.

The Estate of Michael Jackson

Thank you for your continued support of Michael and his legacy.

Best,
Alicia

MJOnline
The Official Online Team of The Michael Jackson Estate™

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Differences Between Leaving Neverland/interviews and the Robson/Safechuck lawsuits

How Many Versions of the Truth can There BE?– Wade Robson & James Safechuck Multiple Versions of Abuse Add Up to a MONEY GRAB-

The Michael Jackson Allegations

While the story in “Leaving Neverland” is based on Wade Robson and James Safechuck’s lawsuits, there are some differences between the film, their interviews during the promotional campaign of the film and their complaints. Here I will post a list of those differences:

1) In the film Wade Robson makes the allegation that Michael Jackson made him get rid of a bloody underwear after attempting to anally penetrate him when Wade was 14.

Robson does claim the anal penetration attempt in the court filing, but does not claim anything about a bloody underwear and Jackson allegedly making him get rid of it. This is all that is alleged in the complaint about the alleged anal penetration [1]:

Is this yet another example of Wade Robson’s ever evolving “memories”?

2)In interviews during the promotional campaign of the film, James Safechuck made an allegation that Jackson supposedly made a video tape…

View original post 1,853 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What about Jackson’s sharing his bedroom with unrelated children?

Reblog of MJ Allegations – Michael Jackson’s “Bedroom” Bigger than Most US two story Townhomes and WHY that matters —

The Michael Jackson Allegations

Some people base their own “guilty” verdict about Michael Jackson on his own statement of seeing nothing wrong with sharing a bed with unrelated children. To be sure, we do not advocate this behavior (that directly led to The 2005 Allegations) and it definitely was not Jackson’s wisest decision to share his bedroom with unrelated children. It is understandable why this makes people feel uncomfortable. Accompanied with his wealth, fame, naivety and eccentricities, it also made him a vulnerable target to these kind of allegations. Here we would like to offer some context to this topic.

Possibly the biggest publicity backlash that Jackson has received because of this “sharing bed” issue was after the airing of the 2003 Martin Bashir documentary, Living with Michael Jackson. In that interview the star talked about “sharing bed” with children. The infamous scene featured Jackson and his later accuser Gavin Arvizo holding hands…

View original post 2,957 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Anaylsis of CBS This Morning Interview with Leaving Neverland’s Dan Reed

The MJGlobal family is the single largest social network on earth. MJJJP is pleased to be able to over a platform for some of them to contribute to the discussion regarding the fictional movie produced by HBO, coming this weekend.

A thorough analysis of Dan Reed’s February 26, 2019 interview on CBS This Morning   reveals that he doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.  —  All information Compiled and explained by @Keb_187 

Director of Leaving Neverland Dan Reed gave his first TV interview on CBS This Morning ahead of the documentary airing early next month.

Reed again isn’t challenged on the specifics of the allegations, but once again comes out with many sound bites that don’t make a lot of sense.

The interview begins with Reed being asked about how he addresses the fact that the documentary focuses only on Wade Robson and James Safechuck’s allegations, with no response from either the Jackson family or others speaking on the late star’s behalf. Reed’s answer to this is the documentary features video of Jackson denying prior abuse allegations and lawyers speaking on his behalf.

In no way can a few clips of Jackson denying prior abuse allegations and lawyers speaking for him compare to hours of slandering Jackson. Add to this the fact the allegations made by Wade and James came after Jackson’s passing. Therefore, obviously, there isn’t a response from Jackson to these specific allegations.

When asked further if he didn’t think it necessary to ask for the view of Jackson’s family or his lawyers, Reed responds with something we’ve heard before. ‘This isn’t about Michael Jackson. It’s a film about Wade Robson and James Safechuck.’

Except it is about Michael Jackson. The documentary has garnered a lot of attention because of who the allegations are made against. The media have been rehashing the same, false, stories from years ago in the build up to this documentary. Who are those stories slandering? Michael Jackson.

While the documentary may well focus on two men coming to terms with the alleged abuse they suffered, with input from their families, the documentary still centres on claims made against Michael Jackson.

When asked about why the two men have changed their stories, Reed puts this down to a deep attachment between the abuser and their victim, that Wade and James were in love with Jackson, and even after the abuse ended they continued to love him and remained close friends, particularly with Wade. Reed also mentions that Jackson told the pair he too was in love with them.

The big issue here is this explanation from Reed once again showcases his lack of research in to the pair’s cases.

The claim that Wade and James were in love with Jackson is one we’ve heard a lot building up to the showing of this documentary. In the case of Wade, Jackson’s niece Brandi revealed that she dated Wade for seven years during the time he was supposed being abused. She also revealed it was Michael Jackson that set the pair up.

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 7.57.48 PM

Brandi would also reveal that Wade had cheated on her with ‘multiple women’.

So, if Jackson told Wade he loved him, and then set him up with his niece, why didn’t Wade doubt Jackson’s supposed love for him?

Also, if Wade was in love with Jackson, why would he want a relationship with Brandi and then cheat with multiple other women?

In the case of James, his declaration contradicts the ‘in love with Jackson’ angle completely.Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.00.33 PM
The above image is from his declaration. He describes Jackson as having intimidated and threatened him and told him his life would be over should he ever tell anybody what happened. He also says he lived his entire life ‘in fear and dread’ of what Jackson would do to him.

Does the above sound like he was in love with Jackson?

Another thing to note is that both men are heterosexual. In a blog post titled ‘Be A Man’ Wade said, ‘I became quite sexually promiscuous in my teenage years, recklessly racking up female conquests as if they were points in a video game.’

Reed is again asked if he has an obligation to ask the Jacksons for their perspective. His response is rather bizarre. He says, ‘Well, what – what does the family know about the sexual abuse that happened? Do you think they know about the sexual abuse?’

Given that the only three parties that were privy to the supposed abuse were Jackson, Wade and James the same questions can be posed to Reed himself.

When pressed again about hearing from the Jacksons Reed says, ‘Well we know – we know the family and the estates and Jackson in his life time and his lawyers all denied that any sexual abuse took place. And those views are strongly represented in the film. We give those views a lot of time in the film on screen, and we have people casting doubt on Wade’s change of heart.’

Like it was said at the start of this article, Jackson denying prior allegations and doubts from people regarding Wade’s change of heart is hardly going to compare to hours of slandering Jackson with graphic descriptions of the alleged sexual acts.

Another reason for not consulting the Jackson family is, ‘I – I – what was important to me was to have eye witnesses or people who could add something to the story. Err – I don’t know if the Jackson family has any direct knowledge of what happened to Wade and James. If they do then they should come –‘ (Reed gets cut off)

Reed never even bothered to reach out to the Jackson family to see if they had anything to add to the story. For example, is it not important that Brandi Jackson dated Wade during the time he was being abused by Jackson and ‘in love’ with him. Add to this, another claim in the documentary is that Jackson tried to make Wade and James hate girls/women. How does Jackson setting Brandi and Wade up make sense going by this claim?

When asked how he vetted the claims, Reed says he did a deep dive into the prior allegations made against Jackson, read witness statements and spoke to investigators and he ‘didn’t find anything that contradicted or cast any doubt whatsoever on Wade or James’s accounts’.

Given the fact that court documents relating to prior allegations against Jackson are freely available to find on the internet, these men could have looked at these allegations and built a story from what they found. However, in the case of Jordan Chandler and Gavin Arvizo it’s alleged that Jackson groomed the boys. James also claims to have been groomed. However, Wade claims he was abused from the second night he stayed at Jackson’s Neverland Ranch. Although it should be noted Wade’s claim of when the abuse began has differed, there was still no grooming process.

Another factor is that Wade and James describe two very different molesters in their court documents. Whilst James basically makes Jackson out to be paranoid at being caught, even roughing up the bed sheets in another bed to make out James had slept there, Wade said Jackson abused him constantly and even did so in a trailer during the shooting of a commercial and a room next to a recording studio with numerous people outside in both circumstances

Reed was asked why he made it so graphic and he stated, ‘I think for many years Jackson got away with this image of being a bit of a child himself’ and ‘I wanted to make sure that people understood that this wasn’t over- enthusiastic kissing or cuddling, this was sex.’

Given Jackson was accused of molesting children in his lifetime claiming Jackson got ‘away’ with an image of ‘being a bit of a child himself’ doesn’t make sense. Jackson was investigated for 12 years and faced a criminal trial.

When asked if he had a preconceived notion about Jackson, Reed says he didn’t. He says he didn’t want to stake his reputation on something that didn’t have a strong factual basis and was untrue. He says during the two years of filming he looked for anything that could cast doubt and undermine Wade and James’s stories and he found nothing at all. He found the men’s stories to be consistent. Likewise their families.

Clearly Reed didn’t look deep enough. Both men have contradicted the entire premise of why they didn’t come forward sooner.

Wade claimed he didn’t realise he’d been sexually abused in his court documents. He says this was why he defended Jackson at his 2005 trial. Yet in a blog post titled ‘F.E.A.R’ he contradicts this by claiming he was ‘petrified’ at what would happen should he tell and truth and that he was ‘drenched in shame.’

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.02.47 PMScreen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.03.08 PM

James too claimed he didn’t realize he’d been sexually abused. This in spite of claiming throughout his declaration that Jackson intimidated him into never telling the truth and that he’d told his Mother about the abuse in 2005.

Safechuck also claimed that he didn’t realise he’d been abused before seeking therapy in May 2013.

Declaration

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.05.41 PM

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.05.49 PM

From Opposition to Demurrer.Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.07.03 PM

Reed says the pair weren’t paid and have ‘no financial interest whatsoever, and no future, past or present interest.’ While the pair may not have been paid for the documentary they do have lawsuits pending in the appeals court.

Reed finishes the interview with saying the documentary came about as he sat down with a Channel 4 executive to look at possible future documentaries and were thinking about the ‘big stories out there that people think they know but don’t know’. He says Jackson was one of these type of stories. He had somebody research and it led to discovering Wade and James’s lawsuits.

Reed says there’s a divide between ‘before watching the film and after watching it.’

Unless this documentary explains the numerous lies under oath and different stories, I doubt many well versed fans will have a change in opinion after watching the documentary.

Posted in Leaving Neverland Debunked, Michael News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment